Saturday, May 2, 2009

inspiration, you might gimme' a fat lip.

"The first public perfomrance of the orchestra of noise instruments took place the evening of April 21, 1914, at the Teatro dal Verme in Milan. The public pressed, thronged into the vast theater, but not to listen.--The immense crowd was already in an uproar half hour before the performance began; the first projectile began to rain upon a still closed curtain.--Thus, the audience heard nothing that evening, simply because they preferred to make their own--non-instrumental--noises!

That they whistled, howled, even that they threw things (certainly no act of heroism) after hearing something that they did not like, that could be understood..But it is difficult to understand why they should go to the theater, paying for seats, so that they could refuse to listen. But it was not reallt thepublic, that is, not the general public.

At the Dal Verme evening, it was principally the professors of the Royal Conservatory of Milan and some musicians who started the distrubance and who were the most violent in invective and insolence! They were overwhelmed, hoewever, by the formidable and infallible fists of my futurist friends, Marinetti, Boccioni, Armando Mazi, and Piatti, who plunged into the orchestra while I was onducting the last piece, The Meeting of Automobiles and Airplanes, and engaged in a terrible battle that continued even outside the theater. Eleven persons required medical attention, while the futurists, triumphant and completely unscathed, went off to sip their drinks quietly at the Cafe Savini."


(Luigi Russolo, in Polemics, Battles, and the First Performances, from The Art of Noises, Penragon Press, New York, 1986.)

6 comments:

  1. I was looking for a reference to the riot at the premier of The Rite of Spring and I found this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_music_riot. I guess I shouldn't wonder that some of my favorite composers are on there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. These things today would never incite such violence. Amazing how our sensibilities grow to incorporate "new" things over time. This is exactly what Russolo was talking about in The Art of Noise, we must constantly be looking for something to excite new aesthetic experience, the boredom of repetition would be the downfall of all artistic production. That leaves us with the question...how do you make something new and exciting now? Have we done it all?
    My personal feeling is that the realm of the metaphysical, inacting some sort of extra-sensorial response, a psychic stimulation of sorts is presenting itself. How we do that? I dunno. I suppose as we gain new insights through technology these things will unfold, or we might have to revert to ancient ways of enacting aesthetic experience through ritual or soemthing. i dunno...still trying to sort it out. but yeah, where's the new aesthetic excitement to be found? i'm certainly bored by a lot of things these days.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Have we done it all?" I wonder that myself most of the times when I create. Am I doing something that is truely "new"? Probably not ever in my compositional life. The problem here is that we (as artists in our own right) can only react to past representations of our individual art forms. To be new is acknowleding the past and trying to move "forward" with that form. New by that definition relies upon the old. This isn't truely new, it is a new tangent off the old path. Even when something "new" it is still rooted in the same original path. Could you say Autechre has not done anything new and that they just took elements that are already present and put them together where it is "right" or "mad skrilla?" Using a "new" dissoant harmonic progression only utilizes ideas that were already there that just hadn't "been used right" yet. I am sure people were writing horribly dissonant music centuries ago, I bet they were just strung up from a tree cause they were "crazy." Late 19th century composers did it and they were like rock stars.

    Have you ever been to a noise show and saw a dude plunge a screwdriver into the input of a feedback loop stomp box effects clusterfuck set up and start turning knobs and adding effects to the noise generated by screwdriver in the input and then act like he was "the future" cause he thought he was the only one who ever had done it.


    Maybe we should start writing music that isn't based upon a frequency range that the human ear can hear, like write music for 10hz and lower and 30khz and higher. Still would be sound waves.

    I wanted all weekend to think of something smart to write to this post, and that is the best I could come up with. This comment is totally disorganized in my presentation.

    "i dunno...still trying to sort it (this post) out"

    ReplyDelete
  4. "i don't want to set the wooooooooorld on fiiiire....."

    AGL

    ps/ psych/

    ReplyDelete